The short is answer is no, but that’s not really the point of e-learning. First things first, the power and benefits of classroom learning can’t and shouldn’t be brushed over. We provide lots of classroom courses and we believe classroom learning is the most effective way of teaching a group of people a set of topics. Having like-minded peers in the room for a whole day or more means that the content of the course can be explored more thoroughly, questions can be asked and positions can be challenged. It really is a powerful tool and in most cases is the go to form of teaching for a lot course types.
It’s because of these benefits of classroom learning that those who are opposed to e-learning base their comparisons on. But we don’t think that’s fair.
Classroom and e-learning are different tools for different applications. In most cases, when a beginner is learning any topic, classroom training should be preferred.
This is because most people will benefit much more learning a new topic which is being delivered directly from a tutor with first-hand experience and thorough knowledge. Most people will have a learning style which is best suited to human-human interaction.
The increased learning time which a classroom course provides also benefits the learner more because it provides a thorough base for understanding and more time to explore the course content.
A Level 1 awareness type course such as our Fire Safety Awareness would last approx 3 hours in the classroom, but the average e-learning time for the same course is around 30 minutes.
The course content as actually very similar. When you consider that a classroom course has regular conversation of up to 12 delegates, at least one break, and a tutor who is delivering the content in their own way (often including stories and past experiences) it becomes more feasible to understand where those two hours dissapear.
But used in the correct circumstance, the short duration of an e-learning course isn’t a reason for it to be avoided – instead, it is a benefit to embrace.
For example if a small bakery with two staff require accredited food safety training for their insurance, then they will send those staff on a classroom course. Because the staff are handling food every single day, it could be argued that the risk is high and they should have an annual refresher to ensure the knowledge is retained – but it’s very possible the bakery won’t be able to or want to release the staff for two days every year to refresh their learning and because the original certificate will last for three years, they don’t ‘have to’.
Now consider a different business, a recruitment agency working in an office block for example. Their insurance most likely won’t specify their employees need a specific course such manual handling, fire safety, DSE or stress awareness – so in most cases the employer won’t provide it all.
In reality the real comparison most of the time is not e-learning compared to classroom learning but e-learning compared to nothing!
By using e-learning, organisations can cheaply, quickly and efficiently refresh the training of their staff with very little or no disruption to the business and little financial outlay.
This is the really powerful benefit of e-learning. Not as a replacement to classroom training but as a supplement.
So in summary, our verdict is simple. Classroom training should always be preferred when a learner is undertaking a new subject. But then in the following years while the certificate is ‘valid’ before expiry we believe learners should be making use of e-learning regularly to make sure they retain that knowledge.